This will be a team that will either get on a roll and make noise or struggle to find itself all season. Talent wise they have the athletes but do they have "players"???
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Seminole Boy |
ACC Volleyball |
Lead | |
|
Now that the pre conference schedules are winding down how have teams looked. To date the Seminoles have looked inconsistent. They have played a very tough
early schedule with Michigan State, Washington, Florida and Long Beach State in the mix. At times they have looked strong and ready to play with anyone and at
other times they have looked rough.
This will be a team that will either get on a roll and make noise or struggle to find itself all season. Talent wise they have the athletes but do they have "players"???
Last Edited By: Seminole Boy 05/28/08 3:51 PM.
Edited 1 time.
|
|||
au73 |
Re: 2007 ACC Volleyball | ||
|
conference play starts next week looking forward to visiting all of the sites.....headed to Michigan this weekend for the Tech/Michigan matchup.....
|
|||
Sioux |
Re: 2007 ACC Volleyball | ||
|
Any predictions on the final standings? It would be nice to see them now before the ACC season starts and then compare mid and post season.
|
|||
Seminole Boy |
Re: 2007 ACC Volleyball | ||
|
In my semi biased and well thought through opinion, well at least 10 minutes anyway....
1. Duke 2. Georgia tech 3. Florida State 4. Virginia 5. Clemson 6. North Carolina 7. Miami 8. Maryland 9. Virginia Tech 10. Wake Forest 11. Boston College 12. North Carolina State |
|||
au73 |
Re: 2007 ACC Volleyball | ||
|
looks good...the pre-season schedules can be misleading first week or so in conference should really tell the tale....some teams peak sooner than others plus injuries....
|
|||
kurtinatlanta |
Re: 2007 ACC Volleyball | ||
|
It's on now - Boston College picked up an early upset over Maryland already.
The big questions are: * Can Duke run the table? If not, who will beat them and when? * Will NC State win a conference match? If not, they'll finish the year with a 26-match losing streak. * Will the conference get more than one NCAA bid? Several teams toughened up their non-conference schedules and have take a few losses as a result. |
|||
Sioux |
Call me crazy, we'll see.. | ||
|
1. Duke
2. Virginia 3. Georgia tech 4. Clemson 5. Virginia Tech 6. Maryland 7. Wake Forest 8. Florida State 9. Boston College 10. North Carolina 11. Miami 12. North Carolina State |
|||
Seminole Boy |
2 teams for the NCAA's | ||
|
I think it is possible for two or more teams to qualify for the NCAA tournament but in order to pull that off the teams have to establish themselves as the top teams in the ACC. Last year there were too many teams aside from Duke that knocked each other off and made the conference look fairly balanced.
While I think it is a balanced conference the top two or three teams need to show that and only lose to each other and not have a mixture of losses to teams further down the standings. It certainly would be nice to have the ACC with a presence in the tournament on a few fronts!!!!!!!! |
|||
accboy |
ACC Picks | ||
|
Seminole Boy--I think you're closer on your picks than Sioux. Maryland has already lost to BC. This weekend should give us all a much clearer picture of things to come.
|
|||
tenniscraze |
Re: ACC Picks | ||
|
Even if Virginia nabs second place in the ACC, like last year, they're still on the borderline of receiving a berth to the NCAA tournament. Although they played a much tougher non-conference schedule than last year, their non-conference record was a fair 5-4 against teams in the West in addition to a couple in the East. However, Virginia did beat UCSB - last year's NCAA qualifier - but their record has not been impressive. So, in order for Virginia to secure a berth in the NCAA, they must beat Duke at least once, and secure a top 2 finish in the conference.
|
|||
accboy |
Re: ACC Picks | ||
|
Either that, or the SEC will get a more "reasonable" number of teams in (say 4 instead of 7) perhaps making room for some more deserving ACC teams. We can only hope!
|
|||
tenniscraze |
Re: ACC Picks | ||
|
How many of the SEC teams are ranked?
|
|||
bearclause |
Re: ACC Picks | ||
|
accboy:
Quote: Really? I'd think there'd be a higher likelihood of maybe another WCC team, another Big West team, and maybe one more Big 12 team. The ACC is a relatively weak conference in volleyball. Last year may have been an anomoly with about 3 strong SEC teams and a group of marginal NCAA tournament participants for the SEC. Even if the SEC doesn't get in 7 this time, I don't see the ACC getting more than two teams in without some marquee non-conference wins. The NCAA Tournament committee doesn't do at-large selections by conference, but rather by the strength of individual teams. |
|||
au73 |
Tech vs UNC | ||
|
Tech wins in 4 in Chapel Hill.....good match, great student participation.....both teams fought hard, very warm in the gym, a lot of slips and slides......
|
|||
UFGators03 |
FSU | ||
|
Any thoughts on Todd Kress at FSU? He seems to do less with more than any coach in the ACC. There is a lot of talent on that roster and has been since he's been at FSU and yet they continue to underachieve. Does FSU even care enough about volleyball that his job is in jeopardy? I wonder if the AD change at FSU will lead to his firing? If they don't turn things around this season, they should look for a new coach.
|
|||
Chip Tate |
other ACC underachievers | ||
|
Virginia probably heads this list with Carolina not far behind
|
|||
Seminole Boy |
FSU | ||
|
I agree they have a talented roster with several blue chips. I would like to see a more wide open style out of the team. They seem to live and die with height and when I look at Duke, Virginia and Georgia Tech, just to pick out three, I see quicker athletes in the mix. Those offenses seem faster paced and their ground work, positioning and play reaction foot speed seems to pay them dividends.
I am hoping this slow start makes for some lessons learned and they take off. That is why they call us fans........ |
|||
Sulo |
Re: 2007 ACC Volleyball | ||
|
Please keep in mind that, although, the last 1 and 1/2 years have been rocky, Carolina did win, or share, the ACC Title(either reugular season or tournament) in 1998,1999, 2000, 2001,2002 AND 2005( and, YES , I am aware of the "what have you done for me lately" school of thought ), but I hardly call that underachieving.
|
|||
boris |
Re: 2007 ACC Volleyball | ||
|
I think the hard thing about UNC is that at the end of 2002, the program appeared quite ready to "take off" nationally. Instead, it slipped some. Hopefully, they'll bring it back to where it was soon and even exceed that.
UNC, Virginia, Georgia Tech, Duke, and Wake are all schools that should be very attractive to recruits. I'm not sure why that hasn't translated into better national success for the ACC, but the 12 year picture is pretty dismal. |
|||
Sulo |
Re: 2007 ACC Volleyball | ||
|
Boris, your comments are right on, especially the ones about recruits. A good example is Megan Hodge. During her recruiting process precious little was said about staying close to home and going to UNC or Duke or any other ACC school for that matter. While I am not so naive as to think that UNC or Duke actually had a chance to land her, or that going to school in your home state trumps( or should trump )other considerations such as possibly playing for a national championship, or in the toughest conference against the best competion or simply the desire to go away for college, and while I'm sure many will ridicule this post by saying "Why in the heck would any elite player go to an ACC school when they have the chance to play at an elite program such as Penn State" I'm simply saying that Megan Hodge exemplifies the problems that ACC schools seem to have in recruiting nationally elite players.( i.e. they seem to have little hope of recruiting elite in-state players much less elite players from elsewhere in spite of the fact that the ACC offers many attractive choices for a college education)
|
|||
accboy |
Re: 2007 ACC Volleyball | ||
|
To UFGators 03--You just asked the million dollar question. Kress definitely has some very talented players, but just can't seem to get the most out of them. Is it coaching? Is it team chemistry? Lack of player confidence? If you saw the match with the Gators, you saw what FSU is capable of in the first game. However, they don't seem to be able to build on their success and run with it. As to the height issue, Seminole Boy, both Wessell and Weissing were outstanding hitters in high school. Wessell got some chances last year, but now seems to be playing strictly defense. Kress had better figure it out pretty quick or this will be just another mediocre year for FSU. Does anyone have an example of a great coach who has been able to surmount similar difficulties?
|
|||