bolliboll wrote:I know it doesn't take much, but once again you have me confused...
I know seeding is based a lot on record...however, that shouldn't be why someone is ranked higher than someone else...
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
VolleyDad9 |
???? | ||
bolliboll wrote:I know it doesn't take much, but once again you have me confused...
Fun? You mean Volleyball is supposed to be fun??
|
|||
bolliboll |
|||
|
sorry meant to say...that shouldn't be the ONLY reason why someone is ranked ahead of someone else.
My Bad |
|||
TX145aFan |
TEJV 16M | ||
|
TEJV16m vs Tour Teams Matches vs AJV Red 2-1 (lost to Red to qualify for Tour) vs River City 2-1 (lost during tour qual during 1st day of pool play) vs Alamo G
1-0 (beat 2-0 in pool play at ASC event) vs APV 16S 0-1 (25-22, 31-29 at ASC event Championship Match) Vs 17's vs BCHVA 17A 1-1 vs BCHVA 17G 1-0 vs PVCA
171 1-1 vs TEJV 17N 0-1 This team should do well in CO--I suspect some of you may be surprised
Last Edited By: TX145aFan
03/05/08 2:52 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
bolliboll |
|||
|
I beleive they will do well in the early part of the tourney. I just don't think they are battle tested enough. However, I hope they prove me wrong and do
extremely well in the tourney.
Good luck to all!
Last Edited By: bolliboll
03/05/08 4:02 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
mavb |
16s seeding for crossroads | ||
|
Somebody please explain how they get this kind of seeding? They must have gone only by won/loss record. Stars Blue has a better record than Stars Gold, but the competition they've faced hasn't been as tough, either. Stars Gold has been consistently playing Open level teams. Oh, Wise Volleyball People please help me figure this out. I guess it's not that big of a deal, but I wonder what it will mean for either team in the future pools over the weekend. Can it make a big difference or not? Just win, right? |
|||
bolliboll |
|||
|
It is not that big of a deal in the first pool at all. You will cruise in the first and second rounds easily. It is when you have to be crossed with someone to
stay in gold or your first round in the gold bracket might not be what it should be if the seedings were correct. there has to be some way of determining seeds
better than just win/loss record.
Oh well good luck. |
|||
docvolleyball |
How the seeds grow | ||
|
It is based on record not level of competition from what has happened this year and in years past. Most regions dont have rankings this early so they go by
record.
|
|||
dawgnit |
Seedings | ||
|
I don't know how a national qualifier could seed any other way but by record. So many teams from across the country. I don't think they could know
what teams are stronger than other teams. Not like in a local tournament. Is there no way of some kind of grading system, based on who you have played and
what their "grade" is? I'm not sure how it would work, just a thought.
|
|||
topvb |
What about the Regions? | ||
|
Wouldn't the regions be able to help identify who is playing in a higher division (playing up)? They should have all of the results on hand.
IMO they should have an interest in getting the teams from their Region the best seed possible. Crossroads has a 15-2 team that is seeded over a 15-1 team. The 15-1 team is playing in a harder division. Which accounts for their record. |
|||
TheyPlayICheer |
Seedings | ||
|
I may be way off base here, but I thought that the individual regions submitted lists to the national qualifier committee about how to rank their own teams.
Now it is incredibly random how the nats then sort those various regions together, but rankings within a particular region should be pretty clean.
Has anybody else heard that to be true or did I dream that up? |
|||