17 Open At-Large

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (kctall60) — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 08:48:12 GMT

thanks for responding to my question. I think all the girls playing in the 17 age group are amazing. The competition has been so fun to watch this year. My daughter is playing up an age group with the 17s and she has learned so much by watching the girls on her team and other teams. Congratulations to all the teams that qualified for the 17 open division. Our team didn't qualify for the Open division but we will be playing in the National division. It's all good.

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (gotsandvb) — Mon, 05 May 2008 13:14:03 GMT

This is from one of the coach his team is in the Mix for Atlarge bid. Teams were ask to submit their overall records and teams they played. I guess, there are a lot of good 17's out there with good argument for those 3 bids.

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (txyank) — Mon, 05 May 2008 07:41:31 GMT

My guess is they closed for the weekend and we will see it posted today.

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (iVolley) — Sun, 04 May 2008 21:35:32 GMT

Why have they still not posted 17 OPEN???

Why is every other division done but not this one? It doesn't seem to make sense, especially since the other ones have been up for a few days now!

Anyone know what's going on?

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (kctall60) — Fri, 02 May 2008 22:00:20 GMT

thank you.

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (lifeonthesidelines) — Fri, 02 May 2008 15:06:46 GMT

http://www.usavolleyball.org/juniors/08_gjo.asp

scroll down to 2008 QUALIFIED TEAMS

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (kctall60) — Fri, 02 May 2008 14:54:11 GMT

Where are they posting the at-large bids for all age groups?

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (lifeonthesidelines) — Fri, 02 May 2008 14:50:09 GMT

AVA 17 Asics are not on the LS Regionals schedule anymore...I guess that is confirmation enough of them receiving one of the bids?

Must be that USAV met their terms and granted them the "appearance fee" :-)

So now it isn't the Texas team that is holding everything up.

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (VBHOUSEMAN) — Fri, 02 May 2008 14:34:22 GMT

That is not an official list of teams who have qualified. That list is for those who have applied for it. If the team qualified in the national or american division, it would state "Yes". For those teams who applied to the National/American division, but have qualified in open, it would also state "Yes" in that list of National/American teams. Relative Youngster's explanation is correct.

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (Paisley) — Fri, 02 May 2008 14:29:47 GMT

That list also has Victory 17 Elite on it erroneously. They have qualified in the American division, not in Open. They do not play in Open, only in Club.

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (vballin) — Fri, 02 May 2008 14:26:54 GMT

Yeah I sure hope this is not right because our team is not on the list and it should be. KNVBC Topeka Impact......

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (Mango) — Fri, 02 May 2008 14:22:11 GMT

RIP THREAD wrote:

relativeyoungster wrote:

This is the list of teams that have "yes" by them in the accepted category inside of Signuptoplay when you choose the 17 open division of USJOC.

...yes, but...

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (kcaz) — Fri, 02 May 2008 14:20:14 GMT

If it is correct that AVA and Cincy are in. Any guesses on who is number #3?

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (RIP THREAD) — Fri, 02 May 2008 14:10:46 GMT

relativeyoungster wrote:

This is the list of teams that have "yes" by them in the accepted category inside of Signuptoplay when you choose the 17 open division of USJOC.

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (relativeyoungster) — Fri, 02 May 2008 13:01:12 GMT
Looks like AVA and cincy are in. By the way, last year, we were given 2 1/2 days to accept the bid (time from the email was sent out to when the acceptance deadline was).

kcaz wrote:
Must be a Texas team. I believe the teams have probably already been contacted. If your student has not heard yet that may not be a good sign. It is odd that only 17's not posted yet.

...lol...yeah the Texas team wants an "apperance fee" before they'll accept the At-Large.

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (gotsandvb) — Fri, 02 May 2008 11:41:54 GMT
Are they doing this on purpose? I'm not doing any work and about to get fire from my job becasue my computer screen is on USVA web site since yesterday. Come'on now. I couldn't sleep or eat. I can't take this pain any longer. Give us the names now>>> lol

Re: 17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (lifeonthesidelines) — Fri, 02 May 2008 09:19:25 GMT
They are not allowed to have any electronics on them even when they are finished--as long as the school is still testing--if she has been notified, she wouldn't know it yet. Yep, that's TX for you.

17 Open At-Large

feeds@yuku.com (VB2004) — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:25:37 GMT
I nominate Mizuno Long Beach 17-Mizuno for one of the At-Large bids

5th in SoCal JNQ 17 Open
7th NorthEast JNQ 17 Open

Beat these "qualified" teams head-to-head:

Beat Golden west 17-Asics (at So Cal JNQ)
Beat SCVC 17-Nike (in Regional Play - Mandatory #1)
Beat Epic 17-1 (at SoCal JNQ)
Beat 951 Elite 17-AM Smack (at SoCal JNQ)
Beat AVA of Texas 17 Asics (at NE JNQ)